Board certification can help you decide which lawyers to interview. Once a firm takes your case, though, someone still has to investigate the accident and explain what the evidence supports. You should be able to find out who is doing that work, what remains uncertain, and which decisions need your attention.
This article follows those tasks from the first meeting through a possible trial. It also explains what to ask when the lawyer you are considering is Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law. Certification belongs to an individual attorney; it does not guarantee a result or mean that everyone at the firm holds the credential.
The first consultation is a screening decision, not a verdict on your case
Tell the lawyer when and where the injury happened, how it happened and what care you have had so far. Bring your photographs, insurance papers and correspondence. Mention any document you signed, even if you are unsure what it means. You can call before you know every fact or have an explanation of who is legally responsible.
An earlier injury, a delay in treatment or uncertainty about what you saw may come up in that conversation. Give the lawyer those facts as well. They need to assess how an insurer or defendant might use them. At this stage, useful advice identifies the unanswered questions. A promised settlement amount would get ahead of the investigation.
Don’t leave the deadline question until treatment ends. Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 16.003 generally allows two years for a personal-injury action. When the claim accrues, statutory exceptions and any other applicable requirements need individual review. Governmental claims may have separate notice deadlines. Give counsel the dates early enough to check them.
Before the meeting ends, ask whether the firm is taking your case. Identify who would evaluate it, make litigation decisions, take depositions and handle trial. If the firm declines, ask for written confirmation and discuss any urgent deadline or preservation concern. Until representation is agreed, don’t assume the interview has protected your claim.
Turning an account of the accident into a testable liability theory
The investigation has to connect an injury to a legally responsible person or business. For a store fall, the lawyer may need proof of notice of the hazard. After a collision, the driver’s conduct, vehicle maintenance or another party’s role may need investigation. A product failure calls for different records and inspection work. Naming a store or finding an insurance policy is only a beginning.
For example, checkout footage may show someone on the floor without showing the fall. A witness may know when a spill appeared. Counsel needs to identify who controlled the premises and which business holds each useful record. A plausible competing explanation needs to be checked too.
The insurer may also blame you. Ask the lawyer to explain which allegations matter under Texas proportionate-responsibility rules and what proof would answer them. Disagreeing with an insurer’s conclusion does not make the underlying fact disappear. It still needs to be investigated.
Preserving evidence before the ordinary business cycle erases it
A recording may be overwritten while you are recovering. A vehicle may be repaired or a damaged item discarded. Finding out who holds the evidence can therefore be urgent. Counsel should identify the relevant camera, time period, electronic record, or physical object and direct a preservation request to the appropriate recipient.
Save the original files, damaged property and witness contact details. Talk to counsel before an inspection or disposal. An unhelpful-looking photograph or post should be disclosed to the lawyer, not changed or removed. Give witness information to the firm without coaching anyone about what to say.
After a preservation request, the lawyer needs to find out what was kept and who has it. There may be a different custodian or a missing section of video. The request cannot guarantee access. If a lawsuit follows, discovery is governed by the rules, with objections, privileges, proportionality limits and court supervision still in play.

Connecting medical care to the event without turning treatment into a lawsuit tactic
Your clinicians should guide treatment. The lawyer's job is to obtain and understand the records needed for the claim. A chronology should distinguish what you reported, what a provider found, and what the provider said about the cause or prognosis. Missing records and earlier treatment may be important.
An old condition does not necessarily explain everything that happened after a new accident. Conversely, a new diagnosis does not by itself establish that the accident caused it. Counsel may need to compare your earlier limitations with the later findings and ask a qualified professional to explain the difference.
If you stopped treatment for a time, explain why. Cost, access, symptoms that emerged later or advice to monitor the condition may be relevant. The lawyer should investigate your explanation rather than suggest one for you. Future care needs medical support too. Find out what an expert would add, and what that work would cost.
Valuing a claim is an evidence exercise
Two people with similar bills can have very different claims. There may be a dispute over fault in one case and limited insurance in the other. A figure based only on multiplying medical bills leaves those questions unanswered.
Ask for separate explanations of the supported losses, the litigation risks, the available coverage or other sources of payment, and the amount you might receive. A provider's initial charge can differ from the amount paid or still legally owed. Fees, case expenses, liens, and reimbursement claims may further affect the distribution of a settlement.
An estimate should change when material evidence changes. A newly found recording could weaken the liability case. A supported surgery recommendation could affect future losses. What matters is that the lawyer explains the reason for the revised assessment. The Texas injury claim value hub discusses these separate parts of the evaluation.
Preparing to negotiate from a record that can withstand challenge
A settlement demand should show why the defendant is responsible, how the event caused the injury and which losses support the requested amount. If that proof is incomplete, counsel may need more investigation or a lawsuit before giving useful advice about an offer.
Ask what “trial ready” means for your file. Have witnesses been located? Can the exhibits be authenticated? What will happen if the defense challenges an expert's opinion? Preparing those matters can help you evaluate the alternatives to settlement. It does not mean that every case should be tried or that an insurer will pay more because the lawyer is certified.
The settlement decision is yours, with advice from your lawyer. You need an estimate of what you would receive after deductions, plus the risk, time and added expense of continuing. A short response deadline deserves a question: what actually expires, and when? The lawyer should explain the consequences of turning the offer down as well.
What filing a lawsuit changes
A lawsuit gives the file a court schedule. Pleadings, discovery, expert disclosures and motions bring work and deadlines for the lawyers, and sometimes for you. It may also make further evidence available through discovery. Find out what the next stage requires and its expected cost. Negotiations can continue alongside it.
For a deposition, preparation should help you understand the process and answer truthfully from memory. It should not give you a script. Your attorney may also take testimony from a driver, employee, supervisor, or other defense witness. Each deposition should address an issue that matters to the proof.
A claim can end or be narrowed on a motion before trial. Your lawyer needs the evidence for each required element in time to address that challenge. A persuasive account cannot replace missing proof. The applicable procedural rules and court orders govern the deadlines and response.
If a case goes to trial
A trial file needs witnesses who are prepared to testify and exhibits with a proper foundation. The lawyer must deal with admissibility, objections and the jury charge while presenting proof relevant to the judge’s or jury’s questions. Preparation also means deciding how to address the uncertain or unfavorable evidence that remains.
Find out what a trial would require from you. You may need to testify and face questions about earlier medical problems. There can be delays, and neither side can promise what the verdict will be. Even afterward, posttrial motions, an appeal, insurance or collection may remain. As the evidence changes, counsel should keep you informed about settlement opportunities.
What board certification helps you assess
TBLS reviews experience, education and references, and requires an examination under its certification standards. Lawyers choose whether to pursue this individual credential. Some experienced attorneys do not hold it. It gives you a useful starting point for questions about a lawyer’s preparation, rather than a ranking that decides whom you must hire.
Aaron A. Herbert has been Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization since 2008. You can check his current record through the official directories linked below. Ask the firm what Aaron's role would be in your matter; his credential does not establish that he will personally perform every task or try every case.
Questions to take to the meeting
Before the meeting, list what you need to know: who starts the investigation, what evidence could disappear and which medical or economic proof is missing. Include a question about expenses. Who advances the money, and what would you owe if there is no recovery?
Also ask which lawyer would handle depositions, mediation, and trial, how you will receive updates, and whom to contact when treatment or employment circumstances change. Get the fee and expense terms in writing. When comparing firms, listen for an explanation of the difficult facts as well as the favorable ones.
Frequently asked questions
Does certification mean my case is strong?
No. Board certification concerns the lawyer’s qualifications. Whether your claim is strong depends on the evidence and law. A certified lawyer may investigate and conclude that the firm should decline it, or that only part of the proposed claim can be supported.
Will Aaron personally try my case?
Ask the firm directly about the intended staffing. A general biography cannot establish an undertaking for your particular matter. Availability and the course of litigation can change, so ask how material changes would be communicated.
Can I speak with other lawyers before deciding?
Yes. Use the same material facts in each consultation so you can compare the answers. Pay attention to the explanation of the work and risks, the resources available, fees and how communication would work. Tell every office about deadlines. Interviewing lawyers should not postpone a step needed to protect the claim.
What if the insurance company already made an offer?
Bring the offer, any expiration date, the proposed release, and related correspondence. Counsel needs to examine what would be released as well as the amount offered. A website cannot determine whether you should accept it.
What should I do while the lawyer investigates?
Keep following your clinicians’ advice and send the firm accurate updates. Save the original records, photographs and correspondence. Let counsel know about new witnesses, bills, work limitations and contact from an insurer. Ask the firm how to send material securely. Discuss any public comments you plan to make about the accident with your lawyer.
Sources
TBLS Standards for Attorney Certification; Aaron Herbert's State Bar directory record; Texas court rules; Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapters 16, 33, and 41.
For related questions, return to the TBLS Personal Injury Knowledge Hub or read the complete certification guide. This article provides general information, not advice about a particular claim.
ABOUT THE ATTORNEY
Aaron A. Herbert
Founding Attorney
Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law
Aaron founded The Law Firm of Aaron A. Herbert in 2010 to focus on developing each client's case and seeking its maximum value. For over a decade, he has represented people seriously injured in major accidents and industrial catastrophes, pursuing trial verdicts and settlements while working to reduce the stress of litigation.
Education
- Texas A&M University · B.S., Criminal Justice, 1999
- University of Oklahoma College of Law · J.D., 2002; graduated in the top of his class
Trial experience & approach
Aaron earned numerous jury verdicts at boutique personal injury litigation firms. According to his biography, he spent a year as the top-earning litigation attorney at a firm that frequently appeared in verdict searches as having one of the highest numbers of trial wins in Texas. At another Dallas personal injury firm, he moved from managing pre-litigation attorney to managing litigation attorney over seven years as the firm grew into one of Dallas's largest personal injury firms.
His biography describes a reputation as one of America's most aggressive trial lawyers, with noteworthy recoveries from judges and juries and substantial pretrial settlements. Most of those settlements included confidentiality agreements requested by the defense. Aaron has said the recoveries were justified by the injuries and losses involved, which no amount of money could make someone choose to experience.
His approach combines passion, preparation, persistence and courtroom imagination. He believes a well-supported, engaged and motivated team working cooperatively helps deliver strong representation, with the goal of achieving the best possible result for every client.
Dallas roots, military service & publication
Born and raised in Dallas, Aaron enlisted in the United States Marine Corps after high school and later received an Honorable Discharge. He completed his university and law degrees after his military service and became a lifelong Sooners football fan in law school.
Publication: “Litigating Dog Bite Cases,” Texas Dog Law Seminar, Dallas, 2009.
Professional affiliations & recognition
Professional affiliations and recognition listed in Aaron’s biography:
- State Bar of Texas
- American Bar Association
- Association of Trial Lawyers of America (now American Association for Justice)
- Texas Trial Lawyers Association
- Dallas Trial Lawyers Association
- Dallas Bar Association
- Tarrant County Bar Association
- Million Dollar Advocates Forum
- The National Trial Lawyers – Top 100 Trial Lawyers
Trial experience & approach
Aaron earned numerous jury verdicts at boutique personal injury litigation firms. According to his biography, he spent a year as the top-earning litigation attorney at a firm that frequently appeared in verdict searches as having one of the highest numbers of trial wins in Texas. At another Dallas personal injury firm, he moved from managing pre-litigation attorney to managing litigation attorney over seven years as the firm grew into one of Dallas's largest personal injury firms.
His biography describes a reputation as one of America's most aggressive trial lawyers, with noteworthy recoveries from judges and juries and substantial pretrial settlements. Most of those settlements included confidentiality agreements requested by the defense. Aaron has said the recoveries were justified by the injuries and losses involved, which no amount of money could make someone choose to experience.
His approach combines passion, preparation, persistence and courtroom imagination. He believes a well-supported, engaged and motivated team working cooperatively helps deliver strong representation, with the goal of achieving the best possible result for every client.
Dallas roots, military service & publication
Born and raised in Dallas, Aaron enlisted in the United States Marine Corps after high school and later received an Honorable Discharge. He completed his university and law degrees after his military service and became a lifelong Sooners football fan in law school.
Publication: “Litigating Dog Bite Cases,” Texas Dog Law Seminar, Dallas, 2009.
Professional affiliations & recognition
Professional affiliations and recognition listed in Aaron’s biography:
- State Bar of Texas
- American Bar Association
- Association of Trial Lawyers of America (now American Association for Justice)
- Texas Trial Lawyers Association
- Dallas Trial Lawyers Association
- Dallas Bar Association
- Tarrant County Bar Association
- Million Dollar Advocates Forum
- The National Trial Lawyers – Top 100 Trial Lawyers
